Media

這本書《亞洲的移動通訊與在線虛假信息：趨勢、影響與實踐》（Mobile Communication and Online Falsehoods in Asia: Trends, Impact and …

這是本書的第二個主要論點的詳盡解說。這個論點聚焦於亞洲各國政府如何應對 MIMS 上的虛假信息，探討了法律監管（「硬手段」）與多方協作（「軟實力」）之間的緊張關係、實踐困境以及對民主制度的深遠影響。 …

這是本書的第三個主要論點的詳盡解說。這個論點聚焦於「內容」（Content）的微觀層面，深入探討了虛假信息在 MIMS 上呈現的獨特文本特徵、敘事策略以及心理影響機制，並揭示了「糾正」（Correc…

這是本書的第四個，也是最後一個主要論點的詳盡解說。這個論點將視角提升至政治與地緣政治的層面，探討 MIMS 如何被轉化為政治鬥爭的武器、國家宣傳的工具以及地緣政治影響力的角力場。 主要論點四：MIMS…

Lee McGuigan 在《販賣美國人民：廣告、優化與廣告科技的起源》（Selling the American People: Advertising, Optimization, and the…

Lee McGuigan 在《販賣美國人民》的第二部分「賦能考古學」（An Archaeology of Affordances）中，深入剖析了構成當代廣告科技（Adtech）的四大支柱。他借用了設計…

這是本書總結的最後一部分。在探討了廣告科技的歷史根源（計算演進）以及其技術架構（四大賦能）之後，Lee McGuigan 在書的結論部分將視角拉高，進行了一場關於政治經濟學與民主未來的深刻批判。 這不…

Based on the transcript provided, the speaker, Lea Korsgaard (co-founder of Zetland), presents a comprehensive strategy for the survival and evolution of modern journalism. Her presentation can be distilled into three core arguments that challenge traditional media paradigms. Here is a detailed elaboration of each argument, analyzing the philosophical, economic, and technological dimensions of her strategy. Argument 1: The Shift from “Information” to “Enlightenment” (The Grundtvigian Imperative) Core Argument: In an era defined by information overload, the primary function of journalism must shift from simply providing facts (“The Latin Teacher” model) to fostering civic agency and “awakeness” (“The Folk High School” model). Success

The “Premium Product” Strategy as a Driver for Digital Transformation The Thesis: To sustain a legacy media brand in the digital age, a news organization must reject the “race to the bottom” in pricing and instead align the digital price point with print. However, this high-price strategy requires a fundamental reinvention of the digital product itself—moving away from “shovel-ware” (copy-pasting print text) toward high-end, linear, and visual digital storytelling that justifies a premium subscription fee. Elaboration The survival of legacy media in the 21st century is often framed as a battle for scale—getting as many eyeballs as possible at a low

The Strategic Necessity of Custom-Built, Democratized Data for Cultural Change The first and perhaps most foundational argument presented by the speaker is that for a news organization to truly become data-driven, the tools must be custom-built to fit the specific culture of the brand, and the data must be democratized across the entire organization to fuel curiosity rather than enforce management targets. This argument rejects the reliance on generic, third-party “black box” analytics tools in favor of a transparent, in-house ecosystem that aligns with the newspaper’s identity as a team-oriented entity. The Rationale for In-House Development The speaker opens by

AI Represents a “Genomic” and “Stochastic” Paradigm Shift Requiring Organizational Rewiring The core premise here is that AI is not merely another software update or a continuation of standard digitalization; it is a fundamentally different class of technology that behaves probabilistically rather than deterministically. Because of this, its adoption follows a “normal” technological S-curve (like electricity), but it creates a friction point where exponential technological growth outpaces linear organizational adaptation. Elaboration The Nature of the Beast: Genomic and Stochastic To understand the gravity of the current moment in media technology, one must first understand the specific definitions applied to Artificial

Based on the provided transcript of the presentation by the Head of AI for the media group (referred to in the text as Wootings Media Group/Boutiques Media Group), the speech outlines a comprehensive framework for understanding the impact of Artificial Intelligence on the journalism and publishing industry. Here are the three core arguments extracted from the text, elaborated upon in detail based on the speaker’s presentation. The Unique Trajectory of the AI Paradigm Shift and the “Stochastic” Challenge The first core argument posits that the media industry is currently navigating a digital revolution that is qualitatively different from previous technological

Core Argument 1: The Imperative of Organizational Unification and De-Siloing The first and perhaps most foundational argument presented is that legacy news organizations cannot succeed in a subscription-based digital ecosystem while maintaining the fragmented, siloed structures of the print era. To break through the plateau, a media house must transition from a “House of Brands”—characterized by disconnected regional titles, separate print and digital teams, and isolated departments—into a unified, agile entity that operates as “one team” across all geographies and functions. The Historical Burden of the “House of Brands” Bourke paints a vivid picture of the pre-transformation landscape, describing a

Based on the presentation by Lisa Irenius regarding Svenska Dagbladet’s success in reaching 130,000 digital subscribers, the narrative can be distilled into three core arguments. Argument 1: The Power of Radical Focus through Unified Goals and Organizational Restructuring The first core argument presented is that reversing a negative subscription trend requires the elimination of metric confusion and the restructuring of the organization to break down silos between journalism, data, and business. The Trap of Metric Confusion and the “North Star” Goal A central theme of the presentation is the danger of dispersed focus. In the modern digital media landscape, organizations

There are four core arguments regarding the future of journalism, newsroom management, and media strategy. Below is an extraction and detailed elaboration of each argument. Core Argument 1: The Evolution of Talent Acquisition — Balancing Experience, Curiosity, and Flexibility in the AI Era The first core argument derived from the discussion centers on a fundamental tension in modern newsroom recruitment: the conflict between the traditional need for deep subject matter expertise and the emerging necessity for adaptability, curiosity, and “attitude.” The panelists engage in a dialectic about what constitutes a valuable employee in an era where AI is poised to

Argument 1: The Necessity of Cross-Functional Teams to Drive Innovation Connelly’s first and perhaps most emphasized argument is that the traditional, siloed structure of media organizations is the primary barrier to solving complex problems and that the solution lies in the implementation of cross-functional teams. She argues that innovation cannot be the sole responsibility of a specific “newsroom,” “business team,” or “product team.” Instead, the most effective way to tackle disruptors—whether they be new audience segments, platform shifts like video, or technologies like AI—is to dismantle these distinctions and create unified “innovation pods” or “task forces.” The rationale behind this

Argument 1: The Fallacy of the “Digital Bridge” and the Existential Threat of the S-Curve The first and perhaps most philosophical argument Steiro posits is a rejection of the traditional narrative regarding digital transformation. For decades, media leaders have operated under the comforting illusion that digitization is a finite project—a journey with a distinct beginning and end. Steiro uses the metaphor of a “bridge” or a voyage across an ocean to describe this misconception. The industry told itself that it was crossing from the “old world” (analog/print) to the “new world” (digital), and that once the crossing was complete, organizations

Based on the provided transcript of Dmitry Shishkin’s talk, here are the four core arguments he presents for building the newsroom of the future, each elaborated upon in detail. Introduction In his address, Dmitry Shishkin, reflecting on his experiences and a paper written for Ringier, outlines a comprehensive framework for the “newsroom of the future.” He argues that in an era of constant disruption—from cultural inertia and audience fragmentation to the omnipresent challenge of AI—news organizations must evolve from being “generalist news providers” to purveyors of “indispensable journalism.” This transition is not a single, monolithic project but a multi-faceted transformation

Argument 1: The “Next Gen” Paradigm Shift — From Institutional Authority to Personal Affinity and Transparency The first core argument presented by Lisa MacLeod centers on a fundamental, irreversible shift in the nature of news consumption. She posits that the traditional “broadcast” model of journalism—where a legacy institution serves as the authoritative gatekeeper—has been dismantled by digital fragmentation and changing audience behaviors. To survive, newsrooms must pivot from relying on institutional authority to cultivating “affinity,” “credibility,” and “transparency.” The Collapse of the Homepage and the Crisis of Discovery MacLeod begins by diagnosing the current state of the industry. She notes

Based on the fire-side chat with Stig Ørskov, CEO of JP/Politiken Media Group, three core arguments emerge regarding the state of the modern media industry. These arguments center on the necessary evolution of business models, the redefinition of internal organizational boundaries (Church vs. State), and the absolute necessity of financial health as a prerequisite for journalistic independence. Argument 1: The Imperative to Abandon “Defensive Strategies” in Favor of Radical Segmentation and Scalability The first and perhaps most critical argument Stig Ørskov presents is a strategic repudiation of the media industry’s traditional “defensive” posture. For decades, legacy media institutions have operated